<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Letter to HHS re: conscience clause</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.turntheclockforward.org/2008/10/letter-to-hhs-re-conscience-clause/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.turntheclockforward.org/2008/10/letter-to-hhs-re-conscience-clause/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:46:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marysia</title>
		<link>http://www.turntheclockforward.org/2008/10/letter-to-hhs-re-conscience-clause/comment-page-1/#comment-21144</link>
		<dc:creator>Marysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 16:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.turntheclockforward.org/?p=323#comment-21144</guid>
		<description>Well said.
I have always wondered why some of the folks who are up in arms about possible abortifacient effects of contraceptives, drugs intended to help women have sex without pregnancy, are not similarly upset about other compounds, with other purposes, that carry even more proven risks of harm to the unborn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.<br />
I have always wondered why some of the folks who are up in arms about possible abortifacient effects of contraceptives, drugs intended to help women have sex without pregnancy, are not similarly upset about other compounds, with other purposes, that carry even more proven risks of harm to the unborn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

